Friday, February 14, 2014

Time to hug a Cuban

Time to hug a Cuban
A rush to embrace a fading outpost of communism
Feb 15th 2014

HOW best to speed change in Cuba? The past few weeks have brought three
different answers to that question, from the United States, the European
Union and Latin America.

For more than 50 years the official American answer has been to try to
asphyxiate Cuban communism through an economic embargo, and to encourage
internal dissent. It was policy as tantrum, a counterproductive failure.
Change is coming to Cuba—but from the top, not below. Since replacing
his elder brother, Fidel, as Cuba's president in 2008, Raúl Castro has
unleashed economic reforms which, while officially aimed at "updating
socialism", are in practice introducing elements of capitalism. Some
450,000 Cubans work in a budding private sector of farmers,
co-operatives and small firms.

Across the Florida Straits, the changes are causing long-monolithic
support for the embargo to crumble. A poll taken in the United States
for the Atlantic Council, a think-tank, published on February 11th found
that 56% of respondents favoured normalising relations with Cuba. Days
earlier Alfonso "Alfy" Fanjul, the patriarch of a pre-revolutionary
sugar dynasty and long a pillar of anti-Castro Miami, told the
Washington Post that he had made two trips to his homeland, talked to
Cuban officials and would invest in Cuba "under the right circumstances".

Barack Obama, who briefly shook Raúl's hand at Nelson Mandela's funeral
in December, has lifted some restrictions on travel and remittances to
the island. Many observers expect him to take further steps in that
direction and to revoke Cuba's anachronistic designation as a state
sponsor of terrorism—once November's mid-term elections are out of the
way. But only the United States Congress can fully dismantle the embargo.

On February 10th the European Union, whose members maintain economic
ties with Cuba, announced that it wants to start talks on a "political
dialogue and co-operation agreement". In practice many of its members
have already sloughed off a "common position" adopted in 1996, a kind of
embargo-lite that predicated closer links on promoting a transition to
democracy. The EU was at pains to stress that this was not really a
policy change, but it is.

One thing the EU will keep doing is to complain about the lack of human
rights in Cuba. Latin America has already stopped bothering. Last month
Raúl hosted a gathering of the Confederation of Latin American and
Caribbean States (CELAC), a body set up in 2011 explicitly to include
Cuba and exclude the United States. In Havana the bloc's leaders signed
a declaration that stated that regional integration should "respect…the
sovereign right of each of our peoples to choose its own form of
political and economic organisation".

Many Latin American leaders see being friendly to the Castros as a
cost-free way of showing that they no longer take political direction
from Washington, DC, let alone Miami. (A handful would like to go
further and be like the Castros.) Yet their declaration was a cavalier
disavowal of the democracy clauses inserted into many regional
agreements over the past two decades. It smacked of double standards: so
quick to condemn dictatorships of the right, today's crop of centre-left
leaders are happy to give the Castros a free pass.

Oddly this rush to hug a Cuban comes as reform shows signs of stalling.
The pace of private-sector job creation has slowed. The government has
shut down private cinemas; it has ejected several Western businessmen. A
special economic zone at a new Brazilian-built port at Mariel has yet to
attract foreign investors, because of the restrictions they still face.
Many Cubans felt insulted when they were granted permission to buy new
cars—at astronomical prices.

The aim of the reforms is to allow the private sector to create the
wealth that the state can't. But the Communist bureaucracy still resists
the notion that this has to involve creating wealthy people. If Raúl
were to die before the reforms have created a broad coalition of
winners, there would be a risk of backsliding.

In fact, the key to speeding change in Cuba probably lies in Caracas.
Thanks to an alliance forged by Fidel and Hugo Chávez, Venezuelan aid
accounts for around 15% of Cuba's GDP. Years of misrule have brought
Venezuela to the verge of an economic implosion. It is the fear of
losing Venezuelan petrodollars, as well as apprehension about the
"biological factor" (as Cubans call the death of the elderly Castros),
that drives the island's halting process of change. For other powers the
best way to help is through efforts that support Cuba's budding
capitalism without offering the Castros any political endorsement.

Source: Bello: Time to hug a Cuban | The Economist -
http://www.economist.com/news/americas/21596532-rush-embrace-fading-outpost-communism-time-hug-cuban

No comments: